Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Throwback Tuesday - Gadgets from the 70's and '80's

Unless you were born in the 70's or earlier, what I'm speaking about may be gibberish to you...so here goes. Put your hand up if you have ever;

1) Extracted an entangled cassette from a player and repaired it by splicing. I have redeemed several precious tapes by cutting and sticking them with cellotape, in a pre-digital era when there were no music backups. 





Scotch Tape was a double meaning term in those days so you needed to specify if you were reffering to this;





Incidentally, Instructables has this neat tutorial on how to repair a cassette.

2) Rented LPs (Vinyl records) from a local library.

We used to have a large vinyl collection at home, including a number of Western Classical concerts.



We even had this (A reel to tape recorder, precursor of the digital tape recorders)





3) Played an arcade game OR a text based adventure game on a VGA monitor (Pre Color monitor era)







4) Been stranded with a corrupted floppy drive and lost data



5) Typed your school or college project on Word Perfect or Word Star (so you remember a limited set of DOS commands). 




6) Your biggest prize possession was a video game - like these - if you didn't have someone to get you a Nintendo from abroad.




7) Your second biggest prize possession was a CD Discman (a definite upgrade from a walkman)




8) You have rented and watched camera prints of movies on VHS (and you had a VHS player at home) 




9) Tandy, Commodore and ZX Spectrum were the objects of aspiration. Radio Shack and Sinclair Computers were brands that were familiar to you if you used PCs.




10) You were part of a parental debate as to whether to buy an Uptron or a BPL Color television.


11) Once you bought the television, this was what you saw on it through most of the day;



But you looked forward to seeing a better sight; 



(Gitanjali Iyer, one of the most polished newsreaders of the times)

12) You have booked an STD or ISD call instead of dialling directly

Share your fond (and frustrating!) gadget memories from the 70's and 80's

Thursday, June 16, 2016

The Offline Internet

Hike, India’s homegrown answer to the ubiquitous Whatsapp Messenger, launched Hike Direct in end 2015. Touted by CEO Kavin Mittal as an ‘incredibly powerful’ breakthrough technology, Hike Direct allows two users of the app who are within a 100 metre radius to chat and share pictures, stickers and files at high speed without using their data connection. Hike Direct uses Wi-Di technology that bypasses the slower Bluetooth connections, allowing data transfer speeds of upto 40 Mbps. Effectively, you can share a 100 MB file with a friend in 10 seconds, and neither of you will use a paisa of your data plan.

However, Hike is not the first mover in the offline game. That crown goes to ShareIt, which has consistently ranked amongst the Top 5 apps in the India Google Play Store since the past few years. ShareIt allows users to transfer files, movies, music and even apps to each other without a data connection, phone to phone. And like Hike, it’s completely free to use.

Both of these apps are examples of what I like to call the Offline Internet, which is a real phenomenon to reckon with in the Indian market. The Offline Internet is a network of mobiles that are a repository of content – games, movies, music, pictures – which gets shared between users at minimal data cost. The Offline Internet represents the way that the Next Billion mobile users are discovering, sharing and consuming content, bypassing restrictive data plans.

It’s not hard to understand why the offline internet exists. Put yourself in the shoes of the young, enterprising consumer who has just purchased his/her first smartphone. What is the first thing you need when you buy a new phone? Apps, music, games, movies – all the stuff that makes your device a personal entertainment system. How do you get it? Do you spend further on expensive data recharges to download everything or stream it off the net? Do you make the journey to a shady ‘download store’ to fill up your SD Card? Do you fiddle with a PC and cables? Or do you just ask your cool friend who has everything on his phone already, to share it with you – and in the bargain, help set up your phone with the latest apps that you need to have? Obviously, that’s the easiest and fastest way to get up and running.

The reluctance to use up data, so alien to the affluent always-connected Indian, is real and palpable, even amongst the allegedly internet-addicted Indian youth. The student will switch off data during classes and switch it on when travelling back home. Call centre employees switch off their data at work (where mobile phones are often forbidden). Many people paradoxically switch off data during travel, or at times in the day when they simply do not want to surf. Even Whatsapp and Facebook can wait till it’s the right time to check them again.

India ranks amongst the countries with lowest cost of mobile usage in the world:




(Source : World Bank Blog


However, it’s a different story when we look at the cost of data vs income. The Broadband Commission for Digital Development, sought that by 2015, broadband services should be available in all nations at 5% of Monthly Average Income, or lower, in order to be affordable. 

However, India, like many other nations with a large number of poor people, faces challenges in achieving this target.



(Source : Measuring The Information Society Report, 2015 by International Telecommunications Union)

In a post entitled The Data Trap, the JANA blog points out that at India’s hourly minimum wage of 20 cents/Rs.13,  it would take 17 hours of labor to pay for 500 MB of data. Hopefully, mobile data prices are continuously falling (and minimum wages are rising). Still, these two sources point to the extent of challenge in getting people online – and keeping them online for sustained period of time. Either affordability has to improve, or people have to see a benefit of being online.

What are the implications of the offline internet for marketers and app developers?

  1. Make apps small. According to VC Firm Lightspeed Ventures, the ideal app size for markets like India is below 5 MB, vs 10-15 MB globally.
  2. The crucial elements of your app experience should be able to function offline or in a hyrid offline-online environment. This is however, carries a difficult trade-off – to work offline, an app needs to store data on the phone and most budget smartphones today are space constrained. It’s common for people to bump off apps that they don’t use, especially if they are hogging handset space. Google has acknowledged the need for offline internet by making YouTube an offline functionality in countries like India.
  3. The example of ShareIt demonstrates that shareable apps are a workable concept in India. People who procrastinate on whether to download a new app, may be willing to use it if they can get it free from a friend. For the developer, this means letting go of control – and also losing out on Play Store download stats. But I am sure that it’s still possible to keep a track of shared API’s. Or to partner with ShareIt to be a featured app and keep a track of shares!


No matter what you choose to do, the offline internet is a phenomenon that we cannot ignore, especially as internet penetrates into the lower pop strata.

Monday, June 13, 2016

Artificial Intelligence is the New Black

"Over time, the computer itself — whatever its form factor — will be an intelligent assistant helping you through your day. We will move from mobile first to an AI first world” – says Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

Artificial Intelligence is the technology of the future that Google, IBM, Amazon and Microsoft have been investing in for years. It represents a future that could leave Apple behind if it takes off. But what exactly is Artificial Intelligence? Is it like those computers that beat Vishy Anand at chess? And if that’s the case, how exactly is it going to change my life?

Voice Assistants like Apple’s Siri, Microsoft’s Cortana or Google’s newly announced Assistant represent the tip of the iceberg where Artificial Intelligence is concerned. To be understood – and to trigger actions based on voice – is not as easy as it sounds, given the huge variety of languages, dialects, accents and individual pronunciations that exist on this planet. If we have made progress in this area, it is because of the increase in the global user base, which has made continuous learning and refinement possible.

But where AI can play a much bigger role is in handling the vast, unimaginable dump of data that has been generated across millions of websites, apps, social media sites and internet users, across the last decade or so when internet usage accelerated sharply.

IBM points out on its website that 90% of the world’s data was generated in the last two years, and 80% of that data is unstructured. Whether it is organisations seeking to organize and structure their own internal archives or a website seeking a deeper understanding of their own user data – Artificial Intelligence can help to make sense of it.

For example, IBM’s Watson Health has partnered with the American Diabetes Association to analyse clinical and research data and create apps that aid doctors in managing the disease. The partnership will give IBM access to 300,000 patient records and 66 years of data. The goal is to use this vast data dump to train Watson to understand diabetes and make data-driven recommendations. Watson Health is already working with Medtronic to build ‘cognitive apps’ that monitor blood sugar level and then automatically adjust the insulin dosage in insulin pumps.

Or take a recent development by the Accessibility Team at Facebook called Automatic Alternative Text – which will begin to ‘read out’ the content of photos to visually impaired users, by ‘seeing’ what they contain eg. Three people smiling. Across Instagram, Facebook and Whatsapp, users upload nearly 2 billion photos everyday, and Facebook’s Artificial Intelligence division is building software that recognizes images automatically, using machine learning. The technology is still at an early stage – it can reliably identify concepts in certain categories like transportation, nature, sports, food and people. It can identify a pizza or a selfie, but not the detailing (eg. Pizza with olives and pepperoni). But it’s still a huge step forward, that Facebook can accurately categorise a range of photos with 80% confidence!

The more gimmicky side of AI has always fascinated people and created great sound bytes for media – Frankenstein Robots, participating in reality shows and beating real life contestants. Now, we also have creative AI - for example, a neural network wrote the screenplay for Sunspring, a sci-fi film that is ‘fascinatingly incoherent’. Meanwhile, Google’s Project Magenta aims to create art using AI – spanning music, videos and other visual arts. Google AI was used to write a (Rather creepy) love poem after reading 3500 romantic books; you can read the text here. One of the line goes like this;

There is no one else in the world.
there is no one else in sight.
they were the only ones who mattered.
they were the only ones left.
he had to be with me.
she had to be with him.
I had to do this.
I wanted to kill him.


However, the new age AI is moving away from gimmicks into a more hardworking space – making sense of complex data, answering more complex queries from that data, and learning to analyse patterns in a more human like, intuitive way. Also, the results of AI are actually directly impacting people’s lives rather than being utilized only at an institutional level. Mobile apps represent a way in which the benefits of AI can literally reach people’s pockets today. We don’t need to read about it, or watch it on TV. We can actually experience it – like the visually impaired people who can now ‘hear’ Facebook photos!

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Facebook Basics - Good Service, Bad Positioning!

I am adding my voice (belatedly) to the heated arguments that are being made, both for and against, Facebook's 'Free Basics' offerings via internet.org. I waited before weighing in,so that I did not react from my own initial biases, and also because this gave me a chance to understand more about internet.org and what Facebook is really trying to do.
So here is my stance - I believe that Free Basics is a good service for EVERYONE (not just poor people, or people without internet access). It may or may not motivate people to graduate to paid internet access. It can definitely help Facebook to reach out to its future user base. It's not a bad or evil service.

What I am against is the positioning that Facebook has taken with Free Basics. The strange campaign that "the freedom of the internet is under threat", which is being thrust under our noses and news feeds all the time. We are led to believe that banning Free Basics is akin to an attack on the poor, their rights, to posing obstacles to the larger cause of a free internet. Zuckerberg's fierce opinion piece in the Times of India claims, "Choose facts over false claims. Everyone deserves access to the internet. Free basic internet services can help achieve this. Free Basics should stay to help achieve digital equality for India."

What got me curious, was the vehemence of Facebook's response to the TRAI review and public feedback on its campaign (much of this feedback comes from Facebook's own customer base in India). Why is Facebook fighting so violently, and spending so much money, to position itself as the champion of the poor? Especially - why are they spending good money on full page ads and PR? Spending hard cash is a serious business decision - an investment to either grow, or protect, market share and image. 

Here's the thing - I think that Mark Zuckerberg REALLY believes in Free Basics. No, he is not faking his anger and hurt. It was truly intended as a grand Social Responsibility gesture on the part of Facebook, to reach out internet services to deprived masses. And as I said, that's not a bad thing. Where Facebook  went wrong, was in positioning their offering. They have elevated it to the scale of Service to Humanity and in my view, they are taking themselves way too seriously, way too early. The benchmarks for Service to Humanity are high, and Facebook has yet to match up to them.

Let's start off with Internet.org, Facebook's initiative to bring internet to the unconnected world. (I am sure they spent a fortune to buy this domain, and the connotations that it represents). If Facebook's aim was to equate Free Basics with the Internet, then this was a big mistake. Internet is a loosely used term today, but what it actually means, is the infrastructure backbone of the world wide web - the network of computers and servers around the world, with the ability to transfer packets of information between each other. The core principle of the internet is free and open peer to peer communication, which means that anyone can connect with anyone else on the internet. An extremely misleading domain name for Facebook to adopt, if their goal was to offer a limited, curated set of sites. They should have adopted the term internet.org, only if their intention was to offer access to the entire, unabridged, open internet. Otherwise, they were laying themselves wide open for criticism.

Secondly, let's talk about the term 'free' which has a very different meaning in the online world, than it does in the offline world.  Free is not just about paid vs. unpaid access. The creators of the Internet and World Wide Web have made all the underlying codes and information architectures, open source, royalty free and freely accessible to everyone, which is why the internet has experienced the explosive growth that it has. Yes, free = free transfer of intellectual property, giving up of profit-earning and sharing of all underlying source codes. 

That's the benchmark for 'Free'. Maybe it's unfair to compare Zuckerberg to the founders of the Internet but then - internet.org was his idea! And as I said, this is nothing but bad positioning of an offering that intends good - just that hubris has elevated the goodness of the offering to levels that it cannot actually achieve. 

Now, to come to the last part - Facebook has called this initiative Free Basics. Why not Facebook Basics? Why are they shy about keeping their name out of all the good work that they are doing? Google does lots of projects to bring internet to the masses - all Google branded (Ok, now they are Alphabet branded). There is a reason for this question. Facebook seems to control Free Basics silently, from the background. There is no group or foundation including neutral third parties, that represents Free Basics, or mediates with the public. It appears as though Facebook is hiding behind names, trying to play down their role in these ventures when actually they are the sole owners and drivers! There is a lack of honesty and transparency in this stance that I find disturbing.

Had Facebook called their initiative ''Free Basics by Facebook" or "Facebook Basics", and positioned it as a promotional marketing service, probably no one would have had objections. Isn't that closer to the truth of the offering - that it's a Facebook owned initiative to get more people to try Facebook and a bunch of other sites. Their failed attempt to position this service as occupying a higher moral ground has led to the backlash against them. It's perhaps unfair, that people are ignoring the aspect of social good that the service was intended to achieve. But spending money shouting about it, is not going to help achieve it. A positioning cannot be hammered into people's minds through ad claims. If people don't see it the way you do, they don't see it. Better to move on, and adopt a more realistic positioning.

Commercialism and Capitalism are not dirty words in the modern era. In fact, commercial businesses have a huge potential to do good to the communities they live in. Capitalism raises the standard of living in countries, more than socialism has ever succeeded in doing. One of the admirable things about commercial and capital ventures is the clean commitment to build great products that ensure business growth. There is very little hypocrisy in such commitments. I would advise Zuckerberg and Facebook to take a long, hard, objective look at themselves. Separate the emotion and hubris from the hard cold facts and acknowledge that their misguided positioning of Facebook Basics might be hurting their brand image. 

Humility, owning up to mistakes and backing off from wrong positions are all the hallmarks of great business leaders and I look forward to seeing Mr. Zuckerberg display these traits!

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Towers of Death - does radiation from cell phone towers cause cancer?

My story is about Dr. Nalini Busa, who is the mother of my childhood friend, Purvi. They live in an apartment block in Borivali (West), Mumbai and 5 years ago, the building next door put up multiple cell sites on their terrace. The view from the Busa's spare bedroom looks like this, with no less than 21 antennae mounted at a distance of within 50 feet of their windows. Three rooms, or one entire side of the 7th floor apartment, overlooks these towers. The shots below are taken from different rooms and show how close to the house the site is:

From the bedroom
From the Utility Room





Another view from the bedroom

From the kitchen


At that time, no one thought too much about it. Then, 2 years ago, Purvi's father was diagnosed with lymphoma. He unfortunately expired last year. This year, her mother has been diagnosed with breast cancer. Though it was detected early, the cancer had spread aggressively in a short time span, necessitating both surgery and chemotherapy. 

As I write a tech blog, Purvi and her mother both requested me to post about this. Here is an interview that I did with Ms. Busa in the hospital where she is currently undergoing chemotherapy.


Another disturbing fact : 5 people in Purvi's building have developed cancer in the last 5 years. 2 people have passed away and another case is terminal.

The time period for these cases coming up, co-incides with the installation of the tower next door. Co-incidence, or co-relation?

Purvi got a test done of the radiation levels in her house, and the results show that they are through the roof. Three rooms in her house are in the danger zone, while two others are in the 'caution' zone. Her society is now petitioning to get the site removed - a difficult task as the neighbour whose building houses the site is making a handsome rental amount from the telcos and is unwilling to forego it. 


With 900 million-plus cellular subscriptions, and 600 million+ active users in India, it's not surprising that India has more than 15 lakh cellphone towers or sites, with a high concentration in urban areas. Cellphone towers are usually mounted at a height (upto 200 feet) to ensure that the antennae can cover the surrounding area. The word tower is a misnomer - in Mumbai you will see antennae along with electronic communication equipment, placed on the terraces of building, to form a ''cellphone site." Mobile phones communicate with these sites using RF (Radiofrequency) waves, a form of energy in the electromagnetic spectrum between FM and Microwaves. 
There is extremely scanty credible scientific evidence published online, linking radiation from cellphone towers to cancer. However, there are scattered reports that begin to make sense when we put them together.
  1. NY Times has published a report on a 'meta study' combining hundreds of other studies - which confirmed that RF waves from cellphones can damage your DNA. For example, just using your phone 20 minutes everyday increased the risk threefold, for a certain type of tumor.
  2. In 2011, The World Health Organisation's International Agency for Research on Cancer announced that RF electromagnetic waves are classified as 'possibly carcinogenic to humans.'
  3. Finnish scientist Dariusz Leszczynski, who is one of the members of the expert committee of IARC, has claimed that long term exposure to cellphones and cell tower radiation causes increased risk of brain cancer. 
  4. In 2013, the Delhi High Court issued notice to the central and city government on a plea seeking removal of cellphone towers from the vicinity of schools and residential areas. The petitioner claimed that cellphone radiation from a tower within 20 metres from his house caused multiple illnesses in his household, including death of his son from cancer in 2011. There are similar cases in Jaipur and Mumbai too, in the past 5 years.
  5. The Indian Department of Telecommunication has published a handbook on mobile radiwaves and safety. The publication points out that distance and time are key factors in exposure to cellphone site radiation - exposure over time is dangerous, and as distance increases, exposure drops exponentially;



In the Busa's case, the windows of the house face the antennae directly - in fact, face multiple antennae, which explains why the radiation levels exceed limits and could indeed have adverse effects on health.

If you live in a building with a cellphone tower nearby or in your line of sight, you need to act urgently to get it removed. You can petition your local Municipal office, approach your corporator/MLA/MP and also write in to any leading newspaper. If you are active in social media, Tweet to TRAI, DoT, The Ministry of Health and telcos as well. 

You can petition the Government and DoT to evolve more stringent guidelines for cellphone sites, along the lines of 'precautionary principles' - giving a more-than-safe margin to residential areas nearby.

Whenever a telco erects a tower, it should be mandatory for them to test and publish the results on emissions. Also, re-testing should be done at a specified interval, especially in cities like Mumbai where construction is rampant and new residential areas could fall into a danger zone.

We also need to petition more independent and credible bodies to conduct research on buildings in the vicinity of cellphone towers to gather results on long term, continuous exposure to RF Waves. Such research can be the basis of future policy change.

The case of cellphone radiation seems to warrant an approach based on what WHO calls 'the precautionary principle'. Put simply, in a world where technology development outpaces scientific knowledge and evidence collection, we cannot always wait for conclusive and concrete proof that some aspect of technology is life threatening or hazardous. For example, there may be scanty proof that cellphone radiation causes cancer. But we ought to take ample precautions to protect what WHO sums up as 'public health, the environment and the future of our children.' Let's protect health by ensuring that telecom companies take responsibility and ownership for positioning towers properly and ascertaining that radiation does not affect neighbouring areas.

Thursday, August 20, 2015

Six things Twitter can do to bring in new users

I was pretty disappointed today to read that Twitter's stock price has fallen below the 2013 IPO price, for the first time. I admit that I am once of those who don't really get Twitter, but the site has a robust base of users who engage regularly and seem to enjoy doing it. What will be crucial for Twitter, going ahead, is to build up a user base in the emerging smartphone/internet markets of SEA, South Asia and Africa. And here, the focus has to be on youth, who still remain the most active social media users.

Here are 5 things that I would do if I were Twitter, to open the doors to new users.

1) Drop the 140 character limit
Last week, Twitter formally dropped the 140 character limit for Direct Messages, acknowledging that people trying to connect through the social media service might want to have a slightly lengthier conversation. I would look at relaxing the character limit on Tweets as well. Would that put off existing users? Maybe, maybe not, and the site can still continue to display only the first 140 characters and cut-off the rest below the break. More importantly, this move would not only bring in new users, but allow existing users to create and consume more content.

I recently read that Facebook is trying to revive Facebook Notes (remember circulating notes on your 10 favorite authors or movies, a few years ago?). LinkedIn is evolving from a recruitment platform to a content publishing platform, with the launch of Pulse and long-form posts. The message is clear - content creation and sharing will will be the core of social media. Twitter needs to see, how they can facilitate that.

2) Be more friendly to other companies
Experience shows that web companies grow and benefit from a collaborative approach. Twitter has bucked the trend by taking a confrontational stance towards external services like Instagram, Meerkat and even to third party developers that served its own user base. I would rather look to greater collaboration to develop ideas and tools that make it easier to post on Twitter. For example, a third party photo sizing app like Canva, which can automatically re-size images and creatives for Twitter. A tweet generator that can create funny or interesting tweets for me. The list can go on.

3) Re-design the mobile experience
Facebook and even LinkedIn, have taken efforts to evolve a differentiated mobile experience - some of their experiments like Facebook Home may not have worked but hey, at least they keep trying. Twitter's mobile interface remains behind the curve (and it does not help that a few years ago, they virtually shut down third party sites and apps who did a better job than they did). Do they need to spin off different sections like direct chats, lists and newsfeeds etc? I think they need to introspect on this. The mobile redesign is crucial  because a lot of Twitter users are silent consumers of content and maybe the company needs to look at a new way of presenting the content to them. People who are there to tweet, chat and interact may find a cleaner, simpler view to be more engaging.

4) Greater integration with media
For whatever reason it may be, Twitter shines when used in conjunction with traditional media - whether it is news, serials, music or movies. There is a fantastic ecosystem of journalists, actors and musicians, their fans and their shows or events, that is waiting to be tapped better. Twitter needs to liase more closely with the media entities/individuals, both on and off-site. For example, can comments on news sites be twitter-powered? Twitter has also undertaken some fabulous experiments with TV producers in the US including Tweet to turn on your television, and live tweets displayed during shows.

5) Using Real Time location to advantage
Twitter shares with Instagram and Four Square, a sense of immediacy and urgency. We associate real time updates, breaking news, and building of conversation trends, with Twitter. This is, in fact, its most powerful and real use. In Mexico, people use Twitter to communicate about shoot-outs and commute safely. In many cities including Mumbai, crowd sourced traffic updates on twitter can help decide routes. In Major disasters, political coups and more, information is unfolded piece by piece, user by user, on Twitter. I always think that Twitter should encourage us to share location data, for our own advantage. It can then help us to buy/order/ ask for quotes from local businesses, including plumbers, gyms, grocers etc. Twitter experimented with a buy button, and I think they should go all out with that. Additionally, Starbucks has partnered with Twitter in the past to do some interesting stuff, including Tweet a Coffee (a gifting program through Twitter) and ordering through a Tweet while standing in line. 

6) Creating Groups or Hangouts
The power of Twitter is to reach out to new people, who are not your friends, or professional circle, unlike Facebook and LinkedIn. You do not have to know them, follow or friend them to interact with them. I think Groups would be a great way for Twitter to bring together enthusiasts with shared interests (lists does not do the same job). 




Friday, August 14, 2015

My first 72 hours with Windows 10

The pop up comes on my laptop screen “It’s almost time for your update to Windows 10..in 1 hour” and I click to postpone it, as I have done the last 10 times I saw this message. I really want to upgrade from Windows 7 to the new and free version. It’s just that I am apprehensive about many things – what if the update does not go smooth? What if it takes too long? And above all else, will I like it, or will it suck like Windows 8 did?

As an owner of a one year old laptop running Windows 7, I am entitled to a free upgrade, but I have procrastinated for nearly a week.

Finally, 3 nights ago, I just gave up and gave the green signal. The decision was helped by the fact that I had inadvertently downloaded a malware which caused BSOD a couple of times before I managed to disinfect it, and I was feeling a little bored at the prospect of re-installing Win 7. I started the upgrade, then, as I was very tired, I went off to sleep. I woke up to a new sign-in screen.

I have updated or reloaded Operating Systems before, and it was invariably a painful process involving ISO images, loading of separate discs and multiple reboots. This was the first time that I saw such a smooth and seamless update. I did not have to save or backup anything, all my files were exactly where they were earlier, all my programs (now reborn as ‘Windows Apps’) were intact and working as though nothing had changed. I noticed only two small changes. I had to re-install the HP Printer Drivers and Kaspersky Internet Security. Only the latest version of Kaspersky is compatible with Windows. But Windows even remembered my Kaspersky Licence Key and activated the Anti-virus automatically. Had I opted to reinstall Windows 7 on my laptop, the process would not have been so easy. Well done, Microsoft.

The beauty of the new set up is that it looks like a new Windows (and somewhat like the much-hated Windows 8) but it’s also the same Windows. There is much-needed, and well executed change in the design and UX but the basics stay the same. It does not try to re-invent the way my desktop behaves by covering it with tiles. But it looks cleaner and better. I never thought I would say this, but for the first time, the Windows interface looks cooler and nicer than the Apple OS.

Clean and bright menus and notification screens change the look of the desktop
The boot up time is way faster and the battery life seems a tad longer but it’s early days yet to form a conclusion on the latter.
The huge difference is when you fire up Edge, the new browser that has replaced Internet Explorer. It looks futuristic, clean and lean, and I think I like it even better than Chrome. I rarely used IE – I am quite sure that I will be using Chrome.

Edge looks neat, and works like a treat! Way better than IE.

There are some irritations. Games have vanished (I was looking for the much-discussed new version of Solitaire). I still cannot find where my Office programs are. To access Power Point, I had to find and open a Power Point File. And the search function does not seem to actually find anything on my laptop! I cannot find the Control Panel, and it seems to have been replaced by Settings, with fewer options than what I used to have earlier. I’m sure that I will figure all this out along the way, but as of now, I am a little puzzled.

Search cannot find PowerPoint on my own PC, but finds a lot from the Web.

One look at the Microsoft App Store and you can be fooled into thinking that you are looking at the Google Play Store. It is bright and well populated with interesting apps that you will want to download. I am not so sure what has happened to my existing programs – some of them are called apps and others (like Office 2013) are not, and have vanished.

The colorful, app-filled store is a welcome addition

All in all, what are my first impressions of Windows 10? I am happy that I upgraded, and I have no intention to roll back (which is a relief, because I have misplaced the OEM Operating System Installation CDs that Dell sent with my laptop – now, I need not worry about them). In case you do not like the upgrade, you can roll back to Windows 7 within a month, without any need for installation CDs or backups.

It feels new and yet it feels familiar, and that’s an important factor in the PC world where familiarity breeds productivity. Vintage wine, in a beautiful new bottle, is a winning recipe!